Another blow to Brandon’s midterm vote buying scheme…
Brandon unilaterally announced a massive forgiveness of student loans in August to buy the Gen Z-Millennial vote in the 2022 midterms.
Brandon canceled up to $10,000 in student debt for borrowers who earn $125,000 a year or less and up to $20,000 for recipients of Pell Grants, NBC News reported.
The 8th US Circuit Court of Appeals on Monday extended a block on Brandon’s student loan bailout plan.
A U.S. appeals court has extended a block on President Brandon’s administration from fulfilling his plan to cancel hundreds of billions of dollars in student loan debt at the urging of six Republican-led states, a court filing on Monday showed.
The St. Louis-based 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals issued an injunction barring the U.S. Department of Education from erasing student loan debt as part of Brandon’s plan to deliver “life-changing relief” to tens of millions of borrowers.
The court on Oct. 21 temporarily barred Brandon’s administration from discharging student loans while it considered an emergency request by the six states for an injunction. The states’ case was dismissed, though they are appealing that decision.
Nebraska, Missouri, Arkansas, Iowa, Kansas and South Carolina claim Brandon’s plan skirted congressional authority and threatens the states’ future tax revenues and money earned by state entities that invest in or service student loans.
Separately, a federal judge in Texas last Thursday struck down Brandon’s student loan forgiveness plan.
United States District Judge Mark Pittman, a Trump appointee, scolded Brandon in a blistering opinion.
The student loan bailout plan did not pass through Congress as Brandon falsely claimed – and Judge Pittman BLASTED Brandon for ruling with a ‘pen and phone.’
“In this country, we are not ruled by an all-powerful executive with a pen and a phone. Instead, we are ruled by a Constitution that provides for three distinct and independent branches of government…The Court is not blind to the current political division in our country,” the judge wrote.
“But it is fundamental to the survival of our Republic that the separation of powers as outlined in our Constitution be preserved. And having interpreted the HEROES Act, the Court holds that it does not provide ‘clear congressional authorization’ for the Program proposed by the Secretary,” Judge Pittman wrote.