If it is getting harder and harder for you to believe much of what you see and hear these days in the ‘news media,’ we’re sorry to tell you but that is all intentional.
The deep state elites seek to keep all of us unstable, unsure and questioning everything because if we do that, we won’t be paying any attention to the fact that those disinformation operations are designed to tighten their grip on power.
So the next best thing we can do is expose the liars and disinformation operatives in the media, including Nina Jankowicz, the woman who was supposed to be the first director of the Brandon regime’s “ministry of truth,” also known as the Disinformation Governance Board. Jankowicz was exposed by Revolver News as being a disinfo specialist, meaning her job would have been to create and spread disinformation, not ‘root it out’ and ‘expose it.’ In fact, her job would have been to ‘identify’ any factual information that runs counter to the current left-wing narrative and ‘proclaim it disinformation’ while then leading efforts to censor it.
And there is a reason why that new panel was to become part of the Department of Homeland Security: Censoring factual counter-narratives was to be viewed as a ‘threat to domestic security.’
It’s all a lie, and Jankowicz was one of the operatives. Now, Revolver News has exposed another one:
It is not yet clear whether Elon Musk’s increasingly precarious play for Twitter will result in the restoration of free speech in the “global public square.” Successful or not, Elon’s brave move has clarified beyond any doubt the Regime’s fundamental hostility to free speech and dissent. Judging from the critical reactions from journalists, NGOs and Democrat politicians, you’d think the man were attempting to invade Poland rather than remove censorship on a social media platform.
Of all the regime scribblers and scribes flooding the internet with glorified blog posts on the awfulness of Elon Musk’s Twitter bid, a piece by Renée DiResta published in the Atlantic stands out from the rest — not because of its force of argument, but because of the largely forgotten scandal behind its author.
Like Jankowicz, DiResta has made a career out of spreading disinformation, having worked for “a constellation” of NATO and State Department-funded NGOs and so-called civil society groups that work to censor facts and information that are inconvenient to the deep state and globalist regimes, all under the guise of ‘protecting the public’ from “disinformation.” And like Jankowicz, DiResta is very closely associated with one of the most explosive and aggressively censored influence operations of the century thus far.
In her piece on Musk, DiResta couched her defense of censorship with the usual platitudes about the ‘importance of free speech,’ but when you delve into the crux of her article, she really takes hard aim at the billionaire SpaceX and Tesla founder while claiming that “moderation” is necessary to “minimize bad information during a pandemic” and “handling a litany of rumors and lies about election theft,” among others.
What “bad information” during a pandemic? That masks don’t work to stop the spread and the vaccines can be harmful and ineffective.
What “litany of rumors and lies about election theft?” The fact that the deep state literally stole Donald Trump’s reelection, as laid out in a February 2021 Time magazine article (a month after Brandon was sworn in), and as detailed in the new documentary “2000 Mules.”
Now, on to DiResta’s work as a dark disinfo operative, as Revolver News notes further:
Before DiResta was complaining about the threat of Elon Musk’s “free speech absolutism” in the pages of the Atlantic, she worked (among other things) as a research director for a cyber security firm called New Knowledge.
New Knowledge’s purpose was to study the spread of disinformation, “malign narratives” and Russian influence operations. In her capacity as Research Director for New Knowledge, DiResta submitted written testimony to the US Senate drawing attention to the danger of such Russian disinformation and influence operations, including the alleged Russian “troll farm” Internet Research Agency — which every self-respecting disinformation operative knows to puff up as the most malign and consequential political influence operation in modern history.
But she failed to convey to the Senate a very important disinformation operation she was involved with.
“This influence operation was conducted by her own employer, New Knowledge, to influence the outcome of the 2017 Alabama special Senate contest between populist Roy Moore and Doug Jones. The details of the influence operation are even more scandalous. In what even the head of New Knowledge described as a ‘false flag’ operation, New Knowledge conducted a secret influence operation to make it look like populist candidate Roy Moore was the beneficiary of a secret Russian influence operation!” Revolver News reported.
Interestingly, The New York Times reported on the now-forgotten operation: “As Russia’s online election machinations came to light last year, a group of Democratic tech experts decided to try out similarly deceptive tactics in the fiercely contested Alabama Senate race, according to people familiar with the effort and a report on its results.”
Again, we can’t do much to convince readers what to believe when they read in the ‘mainstream media.’ We all have our sources we do and don’t trust. But whenever we can expose the agents of disinformation, that is just as significant.